Search results for "Fruit flie"
showing 10 items of 18 documents
On the analysis of viability data: an example with Drosophila.
1990
Larval competition experiments involving two wild type and eight mutant strains of Drosophila melanogaster have been carried out following the substitution procedure proposed by Mather and Caligari (1981). Our main goal has been to compare the competitive abilities of two phenotypically indistinguishable strains (wild and Oregon-R) by means of their responses with eight different mutants. Prior to the analyses of viability data, we have studied the normalizing effect of several transformations in order to determine which was best suited for the analyses. The differences found among the five transformations tested and the untransformed data were not very great. The folded power transformatio…
Carlina acaulis and Trachyspermum ammi essential oils formulated in protein baits are highly toxic and reduce aggressiveness in the medfly, Ceratitis…
2021
Abstract Essential oil (EO)-based botanical insecticides are considered a promising option for Integrated Pest Management (IPM). However, the sublethal effects of EO-based insecticides are understudied. No information is available on the potential effects of EO exposure on insect aggressive traits. In this study, the toxicity of two EOs with documented efficacy on insect vectors and agricultural pests, and which were obtained from the roots of silver thistle (Carlina acaulis L., Asteraceae) and seeds (i.e. schizocarps) of ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi (L.) Sprague, Apiaceae), was evaluated against adults of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (medfly), a cosmopolitan fr…
Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the Ceratitis fasciventris, C. anonae, C. rosa complex (Diptera, Tephritidae)
2015
Abstract Previous attempts to resolve the Ceratitis FAR complex (Ceratitis fasciventris, Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis rosa, Diptera, Tephritidae) showed contrasting results and revealed the occurrence of five microsatellite genotypic clusters (A, F1, F2, R1, R2). In this paper we explore the potential of wing morphometrics for the diagnosis of FAR morphospecies and genotypic clusters. We considered a set of 227 specimens previously morphologically identified and genotyped at 16 microsatellite loci. Seventeen wing landmarks and 6 wing band areas were used for morphometric analyses. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance detected significant differences both across morphospecies and g…
Supplementary material 13 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the …
2015
Individual assignments to genotypic clusters A, F1, F2, R1, R2: Explanation note: Posterior group membership probabilities (PGMPs) of male and female specimens as resulting from Discriminant Analysis of Principal Coordinates of wing landmarks (upper) or wing band areas (lower). Prior groups: A, F1, F2, R1, R2 (from white to dark blue).
Supplementary material 11 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the …
2015
Constrained ordination of wing band areas: Explanation note: Discriminant analysis of principal coordinates (DAPC) maximising morphometric differences in wing band areas between males and females (a) Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis fasciventris and Ceratitis rosa and (b) genotypic clusters A, F1, F2, R1, R2.
Supplementary material 8 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the C…
2015
Unconstrained ordination of wing landmarks: Explanation note: Principal component analysis (PCA) showing morphometric differences in wing landmarks between males and females (a) Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis fasciventris and Ceratitis rosa and (b) genotypic clusters A, F1, F2, R1, R2.
Supplementary material 4 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the C…
2015
Wing landmarks and wing band areas: Explanation note: Position of wing landmarks and wing band areas (numbers according to Suppl. material 3).
Supplementary material 12 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the …
2015
Average individual assignments: Explanation note: Average individual posterior group membership probabilities (PGMPs) of male and female specimens of three morphospecies (Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis fasciventris and Ceratitis rosa) and five genotypic clusters (A, F1, F2, R1, R2) as resulting from the analysis of wing landmarks (light grey) and wing band areas (dark grey).
Supplementary material 2 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the C…
2015
Map of sampling locations: Explanation note: Number of sampled specimens for each morphospecies are indicated in parentheses.
Supplementary material 9 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the C…
2015
Unconstrained ordination of wing band areas: Explanation note: Principal component analysis (PCA) showing morphometric differences in wing band areas between males and females (a) Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis fasciventris and Ceratitis rosa and (b) genotypic clusters A, F1, F2, R1, R2.